Mexican Americans and Immigrants During the Great...

The U.S. is known as a land of opportunity and has always attracted many peoples from different parts of the world. Many come with hope of improving their lives and seek a stable job that will be sufficient in supporting their families. Many people pursued the American Dream, and there are plenty who still do today, and achieved it. Despite the many success stories that have taken place, they were not as likely to transpire during the 1930s as they would have been during another time period. Due to the poor economy and lack of abundant jobs, the U.S. had to go through drastic measures to ensure that Americans, specifically white Americans, had a better chance of finding employment. This included discouraging immigration immensely. When†¦show more content†¦territory and the government once allowed the Filipinos to go to the U.S. to be laborers, the government no longer wanted the Filipinos to stay for the same reason that they did not want the Mexicans and Mexican Americ ans to remain in the U.S. The government’s offer to give the Philippines its independence showed clearly that the government did not want these nonwhite, yet hardworking laborers to take up spaces that supposedly should have been for the white Americans; the government offered the Filipinos a free ride back home if they were willing to leave. Additionally, the eager immigrants trying to get into the U.S. had to worry not only about fitting within the quota, but also pleasing the American consuls regarding the LPC clause; in 1930 President Hoover insisted that the LPC clause was tightened up and enforced better (Daniels 295). The LPC, Liable to become a Public Charge, clause was supposed to check that an immigrant was well off enough to enter the U.S. The American consulates ensured that the immigrant had a near-decent or decent amount of money to start off in the U.S. and was capable of keeping themselves economically stable. Considering the current economic crisis, the gover nment did not want even more homeless people roaming around the streets without any direction, and therefore gave more power to the American consulates in letting them decide whether someone could enter the country or not. This clause made itShow MoreRelatedThe Mexican American By Leslie Rios Medina1701 Words   |  7 Pages The Mexican American of the 1930s Presented to Mr.Hyatt Presented by Leslie Rios-Medina During the 1930s, the Mexican Americans had a tragic on The Great Depression. Back then the Hispanics were also called Chicano because that name is another short version of saying Mexicano. Thousands of people had ran away from Mexico and if they go to the United States, they are considered as a United States citizens so they are marked as white on the United StatesRead MoreBecoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, And Identity1553 Words   |  7 PagesBecoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945 The immigration story of the United States includes groups of individuals from many different countries, one such group was that of the U.S.’s southern neighbor Mexico. In the book, Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945, George J. Sà ¡nchez writes about the Mexican immigrants’ experience migrating to California and settling there, particularly in theRead MoreMexacan Immigration before the 1960s1675 Words   |  7 Pages Mexican Immigration before the 1960s Introduction Mexican immigration has impacted many important components here in the United States of America (U.S.) and in its major institutions of society. In the following paper I will be focusing on the nature of social policies (or the lack thereof) that Americans had developed with respect to Mexican immigration by 1960. Specifically this paper will be detailing six different areas: the Mexican American War, Anti-MexicanRead MoreThe American Of The United States1371 Words   |  6 Pagesother parts of the world migrated to the U.S, or become American citizens under different circumstances, especially during the 18th, 19th and the 20th centuries. Black Americans for example, arose in the American culture as a result of the numerous Africans who were being sold to the whites in order for them to work in the cotton and pyrethrum plantations. Mexican Americans arose as a result of the Mexican American war which occurred during the 1830s and 1840s, where Mexico conceded defeat and surrenderedRe ad MoreAmerican Culture And Its Impact On American Society1599 Words   |  7 Pagesenter American Society and how have they assimilated or integrated to become part of it? Hispanics are a minority group who have overcome many struggles and stereotypes throughout history. It is important to know how it all started and how they managed to become such a huge part of todays society.  Hispanics Americans constitute more than 15% of the U.S population, and the number is still growing. It is the country’s largest ethnic minority group. When Hispanics enter into the American mainstreamRead MoreImmigrants From The Southern And Eastern Europe941 Words   |  4 PagesProgressive Era had new immigrants from the Southern and Eastern Europe. Between the years of 1900 and 1930, one million immigrants who were Mexican migrated for economic opportunities. It was near the year of the great depression which started in 1929. This led the American dream for many immigrants who were looking for jobs and starting a new life. According to Eric Foner â€Å" Voices of Freedom† , page 73, when sociologist Manuel Gamio managed interviews of Mexican-American immigrants in Los Angeles. HeRead MoreAnalysis Of The Article Mexico 915 Words   |  4 Pages The article Mexico talks about the way Mexicans migrated to the United States through the four waves of immigration. The following article describes about presidential candidate Donald Trump’s proposal for building a wall along US – Mexico border. During the first great wave of immigration which was in 1910, Mexicans crossed US borders in small numbers which was around 1.5 million people. Civil wars in Mexico caused people to migrate. Most of them entered through Texas towns and cities. SomeRead MoreHistory Of Native Americans1353 Words   |  6 PagesTexas (who was annexed by the U.S.), California, Utah, and Nevada. More than 100,000 Mexicans lived on these lands and with the stroke of a pen became citizens of the United States, or so they thought. Later that year, gold was discovered in California, starting the California Gold Rush and more than 25,000 Mexicans returned to California to stake their claims. Americans detested their appearance and the Mexicans along with other outsiders were threatened and violently assaulted. One important pointRead MoreAfter Wwi, The United States Saw A Decline In Their Economic1586 Words   |  7 Pagesimpact that it is reported that the, â€Å"nation’s total wealth more than doubled between 1920 and 1929.† The Roaring 20s increased national wealth gave Americans more money to spend which sparked the birth of mass production; all across the nation citizens were purchasing the same goods. This economic growth caused a consistent influx of Mexican immigrants to the Untied States as unskilled labor was needed to meet the demand of the new mass production era. As Balderrama and Rodriguez explain, â€Å"IncreasingRead MoreMexican American Journal Entry969 Words   |  4 Pagesparents decide to migrate to the United States with one of my mother’s brother. We arrived in Los Angeles, California on July 16, 1931, with my Aunt Julia and Uncle Fernando. My family and I were so happy to finally arrive to the U.S. to live the â€Å"American Dream.† Soon we would find out that our dreams would come crushing down fast. After settling down, my mother decided it was time to enroll my sisters and me into school. My mother asked my Aunt Julia and Uncle Fernando what my sisters and I need

Carol Oates s `` Lust `` And Where Are You Going, Where...

Amanda Waller Eng. 155 11/19 Connie is a fifteen year old girl who is confident and proud of herself, and almost feels as if she’s invincible, until she has a rude awakening when an unwanted visitor appears at her doorstep. The stories, Lust by Susan Minot, ID by Joyce Carol Oates, and Where are you going, Where have you been? also by, Joyce Carol Oates, describe the female coming of age. The female sexuality of these three young girls is that they didn’t understand their own reality, but yet wanted independence. The authors get across the message by using vivid symbols. â€Å"Lust,† describes a young teenage girl who has mischievous meetings with many boys. The narrator, which is the young girl, attends Casey Academy which is a coed school. She is sexually active and does not fear pregnancy because she has been taking birth control pills since she was a young girl. The narrator describes her sexual expected gathering with the fifteen different boys she has been with, and when she talks ab out them she seems emotionally removed from the experience. The narrator’s parents don’t have a clue about what she has been getting herself into: â€Å"My parents had no idea. Parents never really know what’s going on, especially when you’re away at school most of the time. If she met them, my mother might say, â€Å"Oliver seems nice† or â€Å"I like that one† without much of an opinion...† (1029). The narrator’s parents do not show much interest in her life which can be a reason to why she cravesShow MoreRelatedWhere Have You Gone By Joyce Carol Oates993 Words   |  4 PagesJoyce Carol Oates â€Å"Where have you gone, Where have you been† demonstrates a dysfunctional relationship amongst a family towards a young lady, Connie, bringing about a dispute as to whether the â€Å"Where have you gone, where have you been?† includes biblical references and irony. Using prior knowledge one may conclude that the short story may sounds as if a person is searching for themselves on a journey unknown to take past experiences and learns to use them as a future reference in where to go nextRead More Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been by Joyce Carol Oates1563 Words   |  7 PagesWhere Are You Going, Where Have You Been by Joyce Carol Oates In Joyce Carol Oates story, a teenage girl named Connie was stripped of her innocence. Gonna get you baby( 497).This chilling line is what the devil said to Connie the first time Connie came in contact with him which foreshadows of things to come. This one comment clearly points to a situation where Connie would be taken from a safe haven of innocence. She would be TAKEN, not simply invited. Connie was a Read MoreBlack Water Critical Analysis1630 Words   |  7 PagesAre We Mosquitos or Are We More?: The Victimhood of Kelly Kelleher In Black Water by Joyce Carol Oates, Kelly Kelleher, a 26-year old Brown University educated woman, finds herself stuck in a sinking Toyota, staring silently into the dark, dirty water surrounding her. How did Kelly come into this terrible predicament? Did she chart her life as a product of her choices? Or is she simply a mosquito, trapped in an instinctual life until â€Å"their tiny deaths [fly] at them out of the future† (59-60)Read MoreA Continued Study Of The Real Life Story Behind2311 Words   |  10 PagesDiana Dean ENG 1102 Sandra Rourke December 7, 2014 A CONTINUED STUDY OF THE REAL LIFE STORY BEHIND â€Å"WHERE ARE YOU GOING, WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?† AND OF SERIAL KILLERS IN GENERAL The name of the man behind Joyce Carol Oates’s short story, â€Å"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?† is Charles Schmid, Jr. or â€Å"Smitty† as he was called by most everyone who knew him. I use both names interchangeably. The names of Schmid’s victims were Alleen Rowe whom he killed on May 31, 1964, with the help of two

The Guilty Party Essay Example For Students

The Guilty Party Essay The Scarlet Letter is a wonderful and not so traditional example of the good versus evil theme. What makes this a unique instance of good versus evil is that either side could be considered either one. Hester could very easily have been deduced as evil, or the bad guy, as she was by the townspeople. That is, she was convicted of adultery, a horrible sin of the time. As for punishment, a sentence to wear a scarlet A upon her chest, it would hardly be considered a burden or extreme sentence in present day. Another sin that Hester committed was the fact that she never told who the father of her child, Pear, forcing her to be without a father. Hesters silence also caused Dimmesdale to live in torture every day. Chillingsworth was also hurt by Hesters act of adultery and because of her, his life was destroyed and the only thing he could do was seek revenge against the man who had been with her. Hesters child Pearl had to be raised by only one parent and that caused the child to be less disciplined and more outrageous making the townspeople more suspicious of who the childs father was. It also caused the religious leaders to wonder about the religious stability of the child, and if there might be witchcraft involved, The little baggage have witchcraft in her(p112).Hester also caused numerous a sleepless night for Dimmesdale. If Hester had just announced that Dimmesdale was the father he would have never have lived through all the guilt that she forced him into. Dimmesdale was a weak and frail man because of Hesters silence. Chillengsworth was pushed into a life of revenge and anguish since Hester had betrayed their marriage and Chillengsworths trust in her. She had turned Chillengsworth into a fiend, I have already told thee what I am, a fiend! (P169). Hester admitts to causing Chillengsworth into becoming the fiend as well. The guilt rests solely on Hester Prynne for destroying not just her own life from this sin but also of many other people such as the minister Dimmesdale, the physician Chillengsworth, and her own daughter Pearl. Hester manipulated and destroyed Dimmesdales very life and caused Chillengsworth to degrade himself into living a life of revenge, she also caused Pearl to be shunned by society and to be looked down upon as if she was a demon. It is quite obvious who the true sinner is in this book and it is Hester Prynne.

The Hitch-Hiker and Samphire Essay Example

The Hitch-Hiker and Samphire Paper The two short stories of Samphire and The Hitch-Hiker can be considered as two very different stories, however some similarities can still be found between them. The story of Samphire, written by Patrick OBrian, is a story about a woman named Mollie who, as made obvious in the story, simply despises her husband named Lacey, a strange little man who doenst show much real care for his wife. Appearing to be a conventional married couple on holiday by the sea, as the story progresses, the emptiness of their relationship becomes visible, and Mollies unhappiness leads to her desperate attempt to kill her husband, which doesnt go through as planned. Roald Dahls The Hitch-Hiker is a comedic and suprising story about a man who picks up an unusual hitch-hiker. The strange hitch-hiker eventually gets the driver into trouble with the authorities, but as unexpected events take place, the drivers view of the strange hitch-hiker changes. A good way to compare stories is to first look at the main characters, or the protagonists and antagonists. For the first story of Samphire, it is obvious that Mollies husband Lacey is the antagonist of the story, atleast that is how the author describes him to us; the author makes it quite clear to the reader that everything Lacey does annoys Mollie, that he is weak and does not really care for Mollie. It is noticeable that Mollie does not say one word to her husband throughout the whole story, more evidence that her husband is simply to self-involved to even notice her silence. We will write a custom essay sample on The Hitch-Hiker and Samphire specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Hitch-Hiker and Samphire specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Hitch-Hiker and Samphire specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer It is evident that Lacey is even slightly abusive in their relationship: Lacey was her lord and master, wasnt he? Love, honour, and obey? He put his arm round her when they came to a sheltered turn of the path and began to fondle her, whispering in his secret night-voice, Tss-ts-tss, but he dropped her at once when some coast-gaurds appeared. Mollie attempts to murder her husband, almost appearing as the heroin of the story at this point due to the readers hate for her husband, essentially making her the protagonist of the story. For the story of The Hitch-Hiker, identifying the protagonist and antagonist becomes a little more complicated. In the beginning of the story, we percieve the driver, essentially Roald Dahl as the story is in the 1st person, as the protagonist and the hitch-hiker that he picks up, named Michael Fish, as the antagonist. Roald Dahl describes the hitch hiker similarly to a rat so that it makes the reader assume that the hitch hiker is probably a murderer or some other sort of criminal; once the reader assumes that, it will make them predict that something bad or interesting will happen involving the narrator and hitch-hiker. However as the story progresses, we see that the hitch-hiker may have been wrongly labelled, helping the driver out of a speeding ticket and changing the antagonist to the police officer that pulls them over for speeding. In these ways, the two stories are quite different in terms of protagonists and antagonists. Both stories are based closely on the conflicts and relationships within them. A distinct conflict can be found within the story of Samphire between the married couple of Mollie and Lacey. Throughout the story, the author makes it clear to the reader that everything her husband does annoys Mollie to the point that she simply stops caring: At the next tobacconist, by the pier, he made the same joke to the man there. She stood near the door, not looking at anything. Though she hesitates at first, Mollie tries to push Lacey off of the cliff and nearly succeeds in killing him, elevating their conflict. Though at first the conflict seems to be between the hitch-hiker and the driver, the main conflict within The Hitch-Hiker comes down to the strife between the driver and the police officer. We are introduced to the hitch-hiker as a sinnacle, suspiscious looking man who appears to be nothing but trouble, and though the hitch-hiker tempts the driver to speed, he then saves the driver from the police officer by stealing the officers black book. Though the driver never fully trusts the hitch-hiker, by the end of the story they form a relationship as the driver is thankful of the strange hitch-hiker. Each story has its own themes that make the two stories unique from eachother. One similarity between the two stories themes is that the stories both finish at the same place they started. For instace, in Samphire, the story starts with the woman Mollie being miserable with her husband. The climax of the story is when she attempts to kill her husband, however she does not succeed, and the story ends where it started, ending with the line: and there were her feet marching on the path; one, the other; one, the other, down, down, down as if to show that this was not the first time she had done this. With The Hitch-Hiker, the story begins with a man driving; he then picks up a hitch-hiker and they get pulled over for speeding. By the end of the story however, the hitch-hiker has stolen the police officers black book, therefore essentially going back to the start. The other similarity between the stories is that there is an element of misjudgement within them. For example, in Samphire, the husband Lacey misjudges his wife into thinking that she actually cares about him and his samphire plant: In the morning she said she would like to see the samphre again. He was very pleased and told the hotel-keeper that she was becoming quite the little botanist, his misjudgement of course leading to the attempted murder. As for The Hitch-Hiker, it is the driver that misjudges the hitch-hiker; although the driver labels the hitch-hiker as a rather suspicious person, he rescues the driver from a speeding ticket, and the drivers way of judging people by speech and appearance is changed. The literary presentation is another thing to look at when comparing two stories. In terms of the level of detail that is used in the stories, each story uses about the same amount, each being fairly descriptive in their own way. OBrian does a good job of painting a picture of the enviroment and misery in Samphire, where as Dahl uses descriptive imagery to show us exactly what the hitch-hiker would look and act like. One difference between the two stories is the atmoshphere of the stories; the atmosphere of Samphire is almost one of misery and emptiness, whereas the feeling that you get when reading The Hitch-Hiker is one of interest and intrigue, mostly wanting to see what the characters say to eachother and finding out who the mysterious hitch-hiker is. The major difference between the two stories in terms of literary presentation however is the conversation and interaction between characters within the stories. The only conversation within Samphire is done by the husband, whereas Mollie never talks, leaving the story to progress through actions rather than dialogue. On the other side, The Hitch-Hiker is based solely on the witty dialogue between the driver and his passenger that keeps the story progressing and interesting. Overall, the two stories have their similarities and their differences; while certain similarities can be found between the two stories themes and conflicts, they each become unique when it comes down to the characters and overall literary presentation.